Question about non attackable BAN

DeletedUser

Guest
This is just a question about this NON-ATTACKABLE ban and why it has been created?

I am wondering the rationale behind 2 different types of BANS...

ATTACKABLE BANS
NON-ATTACKABLE BANS.

I am familiar with the rules of this game and would like to ask both the MODERATORS and the Developers this question.

I have known many players who have used this non-attackable ban in the past to avoid their villages being taken over as the ultimate revenge against their enemies. I feel it is unfair for a player to get a none attackable ban. I feel that if a player breaks the rules SO BADLY that they get a permanent ban we should be allowed to take their villages.

BUT if players use this to their advantage then why have it?

It would be nice if we had a POLL in the servers to leave it up to the players.

What do you think?
 

DeletedUser4002

Guest
Most times a banned player has the chance to chose between taking a punishment (like loosing villages i.e.) or gettin his account deleted. Sometimes a ban is not legitim and a player is able to explain the circumstances. If someone is realy innocent. it would be very hard to get banned attackable.

I think a ban is always a punishment an a very bad way to save the villages.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top