Rejected: New Idea!

Discussion in 'Old Ideas' started by Energy, May 13, 2010.

  1. Energy

    Energy Guest

    I would like Tribal Wars to have a new automatic setting, were players cannot support barbarian villages in the first 30 days of the world opening. I'm sure other people agree too that their are far to many spiked barbarian/bonus villages.

    This will help players grow at the beginning.

    Feel free to discuss and express your opinion here:




    Energy
    ________
    Free wordpress themes
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 28, 2011
  2. lindley08

    lindley08 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    2
    Spiking is a strategy, lets also remove attacking other players in the first 30 days, Lets also remove cats from the game so people don't cat each other down as its annoying when your farm is catted down don't you agree?

    :/
     
  3. Energy

    Energy Guest

    Are you being sarcastic? If you are then you have just made a terrible attempt at it. -.-
    ________
    Ipad cases
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 28, 2011
  4. lindley08

    lindley08 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    2
    If you knew i was been sarcastic, i don't think it was a terrible attempt.

    Spiking is a strategy, some people use it, some people hate it.

    You can't just ban all strategies you don't like.
     
  5. Superkarma

    Superkarma New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    This setting is nothing new i think. It has been offered in many worlds in the form of "No support allowed outside tribe" rule.
     
  6. lindley08

    lindley08 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    2
    That is mostly to stop noob family tribes, not spiking.

    it also stops people sending noble trains & sending support to land straight after.
     
  7. Sneggy

    Sneggy Guest

    Now sending noble trains with support landing straight after is a sound tactic in a war...but hang on I thought banning strategies we don't like is against Lindleys rules OMGWTFBBQ!111!!!11111

    Hes making a suggestion, dont flame him for it, be constructive or don't post.
    Ideas forum suggests ideas, if nothing is suggested then nothing changes which would defeat the purpose of a beta world anyway.
     
  8. The 2nd post in this thread is dripping with sarcasm, if that's an opinion then you are a great PnP'er. You mocked his suggestion by responding with even more stupid suggestions.
     
  9. pheeca

    pheeca Guest

    y r u guyz r so against spiking??? u r only pissed bcoz ur farms are spiked??? dude row up and live with it!!
     
  10. lindley08

    lindley08 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    2
    ^ this, without the terrible spelling & grammar.
     
  11. Lunafire

    Lunafire Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    1
    Oh the hypocrisy :D

    Still, rather dumb idea, I vote thumbs down to preventing the support of barbs.
     
  12. pheeca

    pheeca Guest

    english isnt my mother tongue!!!
     
  13. The Lewder

    The Lewder Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    793
    Likes Received:
    1
    ^ this.

    All this idea would do is endorse noob stratergies. Spiking is part of the game, and on the front of 'no support outside tribe', that is maintained during the whole game, and applies to everyone, not just barbs.