Rejected: Account sitter

Discussion in 'Old Ideas' started by The one, Mar 26, 2010.

  1. The one

    The one Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have seen a lot of player who set each other as sitters who live in deifferent time zones so that one might play when the other is asleep and vice versa.

    So doing this each one has to set each other as a sitter when ever they logout (after logging in) so well :

    I would like to see a checkbox besides the sitter you have set , if checked when I login to my village and logout I don't have to set my sitter again and again and again and the person I have set as my sitter does not have to accept my sitting request again and again and again :) .
     
  2. ubijalec124

    ubijalec124 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    223
    Likes Received:
    0
    lol might be a good idea, but i don`t think it takes to much time to set a sitter.
     
  3. The one

    The one Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah I know that but a lot of player forget to set sitters some time , and besides those who are lazy will like this very much. :)
     
  4. Typhi

    Typhi Product Manager

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    849
    Likes Received:
    15
    To what extent is making it easier for people to set sitters actually desirable? There is a large focus on teamwork in TW, yes, but having accounts played 24/7 can ultimately be detrimental to the game.
     
  5. The one

    The one Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why exactly will it be detrimental to the game?
     
  6. ubijalec124

    ubijalec124 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    223
    Likes Received:
    0
    i don`t think that making the game easy for lazy people is desired. We don`t want noobs to be able to come to 1st place without any effort, while others work hard. If you are to lazy to set a sitter, which takes not even 1minute, then good help deer.

    That`s a stupid question imho. Because those players will be able to progress faster than others, while they will work less for it.
     
  7. The one

    The one Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    But TW is a game which cannot be won without team work , can anyone handel a 1000 village account here alone NO.You need co-players for that , you can not blame them for being no 1 and having co-players.I am sure most players here have co-played with some one else in the past.
     
  8. ubijalec124

    ubijalec124 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    223
    Likes Received:
    0
    that what you said here, and that what you spoke before about are not one and the same.
     
  9. The Lewder

    The Lewder Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    793
    Likes Received:
    1
    I could.

    Mass-Recruit/minting scripts would deal with that no problem.

    I had 200 villages, was a baron of a relatively high-ranked tribe, had premium and I got by quite nicely.

    Co-playing is an advantage, yes. Though in that case, there is only one account being operated.

    But to the point, I see no use in the feature. It only takes a minute to set someone as a sitter.
     
  10. The one

    The one Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah you have a point there.
    OK well since no one likes this can some one please lock this up.
     
  11. fp0815

    fp0815 Staemme in my heart <3

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    2,418
    Likes Received:
    20
    I did so, without any problems. ;-)
    But in fact, it is much easier on the German DE, where you can use a lot of GM-scripts to handle an account. ^^